top of page
  • RealVal

Deals v/s Funds: Which to choose?

Real estate has always and traditionally been seen as a sound investment, with the potential for both long-term growth and consistent revenue streams. Usually, investors might enter the real estate market through one of two methods: investing directly in individual properties or purchasing shares in real estate funds. However, each strategy comes with its own set of pros and disadvantages. In this article, we'll discuss the distinctions between investing in real estate funds and doing real estate deals, that might help you make an informed decision about which of the two to pick.

Real Estate Funds

Real estate funds pool money from various investors to buy a property portfolio. These funds are managed by real estate professionals with substantial experience. Real estate funds, often known as REITs or mutual funds, aggregate capital from different investors to purchase and manage a diverse portfolio of properties. These funds can be publicly listed or privately held, thus catering to various categories of investors.


  1. Diversification: Real estate funds provide investors with access to a diverse portfolio of properties, including residential, commercial, industrial, and retail; distributing risk across various asset kinds, regions, and investing methods. This diversity lessens the impact of market volatility and lowers the risk of investing in a single property, and lessen the hazards associated with individual property ownership.

  2. Professional Management: Investors can benefit from the knowledge of seasoned experts who handle property selection, acquisition, and management by investing in real estate funds. This relieves investors of the day-to-day responsibilities of property management, such as tenant disputes, upkeep, and regulatory compliance.

  3. Accessibility: When compared to acquiring individual properties, real estate funds frequently have lower minimum investment requirements, making them more accessible to a broader spectrum of investors. Furthermore, funds allow individuals to enter the real estate market without having to devote substantial time and effort to managing properties themselves.

  4. Passive Income: Rental payments or capital gains from property sales are common sources of income for real estate funds. Fund investors receive a portion of these profits, providing a consistent income stream without the requirement for active involvement in property management.

  5. Liquidity: When compared to direct real estate transactions, publicly traded real estate funds provide greater liquidity. Stock exchanges allow investors to buy and sell shares, allowing for a quick departure if necessary.


  1. Lack of Control: Investing in real estate funds entails giving up direct influence over real estate decisions. Investors must trust the fund's management staff to make sound decisions.

  2. Market Correlation: Real estate funds' performance may be influenced by broader market movements and stock market volatility.

  3. Fees: Management fees and expense ratios in real estate funds can reduce overall profits for investors.

Real Estate Deals

Real estate transactions, on the other hand, entail the direct purchase and management of individual properties.


  1. Control & Flexibility: Real estate investing gives investors direct control over property selection, financing, and management decisions. This level of control provides for better adaptability in investing strategies and market responses.

  2. Enhanced Returns: Successful real estate transactions can provide significant returns on investment. Investors can dramatically increase property value and rental revenue potential by picking undervalued or distressed properties and implementing value-add measures such as renovations or repositioning.

  3. Tax Benefits: Investors who own real estate can benefit from a variety of tax breaks, including depreciation deductions, 1031 exchanges, and capital gains tax breaks. These tax breaks can boost overall investment returns and give significant advantages for long-term wealth growth.

  4. Tangibility: Direct investment in real estate transactions provides physical asset ownership, which may appeal to some investors. Owning physical possessions provides a sense of security as well as the possibility of additional benefits such as personal use or development opportunities.


  1. Concentrated Risk: Individual property investments can expose investors to greater risk, particularly if the property is located in a single market or sector that endures downturns.

  2. Management Demands: Direct ownership of real estate necessitates significant time and effort for property maintenance, which may not suit passive investors.

  3. High Entry Barriers: Individual real estate transactions can need large upfront funds, limiting access to investors with big means.

Which of the two to choose?

It is critical to assess your investment goals, risk tolerance, and available resources before considering whether to invest in real estate funds or real estate projects. Real estate funds provide diversification, expert management, accessibility, and passive income, making them ideal for hands-off investors. Real estate deals, on the other hand, offer control, the potential for larger profits, tax advantages, and tangible asset ownership, making them enticing to individuals ready to actively manage properties.

Finally, the decision between real estate funds and real estate deals is influenced by your personal tastes, financial circumstances, and investment goals. Some individuals may decide to diversify their portfolios by investing in both choices. Seeking financial professionals' assistance and completing extensive study on specific prospects are critical.

19 views0 comments
bottom of page